Numbers & Statistics

Transcript of the October 2019 African Finance Ministers Press Conference

By  | 

Via IMF (Den Internationale Valutafond)

Transcript of the October 2019 African Finance Ministers Press Conference







October 21, 2019
















&nbsp

GEDIMINAS VILKAS, IMF

ABDIRAHAMAN DUALE BEILEH, Somalia

ABDOULAYE DAOUDA DIALLO, Senegal

MOHAMED LEMINE OULD DHEHBI, Mauritania

UKUR YATANI KANACHO, Kenya

&nbsp

MR. VILKAS: Good afternoon and welcome to this press conference of African
Finance Ministers. The focus of this press conference African economic
integration, the challenge and opportunities, but also having in mind the
African Continental Free Trade agreement that has been signed in March this
year.

So, my name is Gediminas Vilkas. I am with the IMF Communication Department
and I am delighted to introduce you the ministers, the speakers of today’s
press conference. So, I’ll start from my left.

So first of all, the Minister of Finance of Somalia, Mr. Abdirahman Duale
Beileh; the Minister of Finance and Budget of Senegal, Mr. Abdoulaye Daouda
Diallo; the Minister of Finance of Mauritania, Mr. Mohamed Lemine Ould
Dhehbi; and the Acting Finance Cabinet Secretary at National Treasury of
Kenya, Mr. Ukur Yatani Kanacho.

So, without further ado, I will give the floor to the ministers and then
we’ll have some time for questions. So first of all, the Minister from
Somalia, please.

MR. BEILEH: Thank you very much, Mr. Coordinator, and good afternoon
everybody. It’s indeed a pleasure for me to be here addressing something
that is very important for Africa, and for the rest of the world, in fact.
And, from the point of view of Somalia, which is a country that is known to
have been very fragile and continues to be fragile and how do we marry the
two.

I think that trade, everybody knows, is a very important component of
economic development, economic performance, and I think we should all
encourage trade.

Unfortunately, trade in Africa always looked at overseas trade; the legacy
of the history of Africa. Africa is trading with their partners in Europe
and elsewhere. I think it’s about time that we start looking to our
neighbors — very cheaper. And they also express demand.

There are certain things that we can produce and send it to our neighbors
and there are certain things that we can get from them much cheaper than we
can get those same goods and services from overseas.

We are now working on Horn of Africa Program and that program has trade as
one of the major components. This project is being co-proposed by the
African Development Bank, The World Bank, and the EU; three heavyweights of
our partners, and we are looking forward to that.

We had a big meeting yesterday — ministerial meeting — and we are look —
a big component is trade.

Now, I think it will depend it will vary from country to country on how
best the countries can make use of trade. Somalia being fragile, I think we
have been humbled by debt overhang in our country to do anything, really.
We did not have any access to any of the concessionary windows of the IFIs
for 30 years and we are struggling.

Our focus today is to do something with the debt; do away with the debt.
And Somalia today is really climbing to the best of our effort and the
effort of the international community. We are looking forward to early next
year when we expect a decision point to be reached. And thus, therefore, a
cancelation of the debt — and therefore, I should say, access to the
international communities’ concessionary windows.

We will then put a lot of emphasis on trading. As you may know, Somalis are
traders. Everywhere they go, they do business. That is probably in our
blood, whatever it is. And really, even in the regional integration program
that we are working with five other — four other countries, we are putting
the basis for the infrastructure basis and the rules and regulations and
the tariff systems and policies that will guide our regional integration.

So, we are looking forward to that, Mr. Chairman, and I will stop there.
You gave me four minutes and I think that’s sufficient. I can talk about
Somalia all the day because that’s what I do, but I look forward to your
questions. Thank you very much, sir.

MR. VILKAS: Thank you, Minister. So now, please, Mr. Diallo.

MR. DIALLO: Thank you very much. Good afternoon, everyone. Yes, it is a
great opportunity that we have to speak about our situations, but above
all, of this regional integration, which is of particular interest to
Senegal.

Senegal has always been one of the precursors of African unity, the African
Union, but above all, we’ve been a part of all of the sub-regional
authorities within the framework of economic and social cooperation, and
even political cooperation.

It’s true that we have already in two unions the economy that concerns
eight countries, and then we’re in ECOWAS, which is an economic commission,
and we have recently joined the latest union, the Monetary Union, the
African Central Free Trade area. And so, we are making progress on other
fronts.

But with respect to Senegal, in fact, since the President of the Republic,
Macky Sall, was elected, we’ve gone through two stages. The first stage is
PS1, which lasted for five years as of 2014. And then the second phase,
which we are currently experiencing right now.

And so, in this phase, at this stage, what we call the Phase 2 of PSE, it’s
$14.8 billion for 700 projects and it’s going to be carried out over five
years. And that means that we have some major initiatives and the program
has a precedent set.

It’s a program that we can summarize in one important figure and that is
535. There are five initiatives that are very important. It’s three
programs that are important and five major thrusts of the Number 535. And
so that is directed to a single objective and that is better overall
well-being for the Senegalese population.

Of course, it cannot go forward without, of course, a good participation,
good presence of Senegal and Africa, because if we look at what is
happening in our continent, we have a fairly low level compared to the rest
of the world. Fifteen percent of our trade is inter-African as opposed to
other zones. For example, in Asia where it’s almost 60 percent, 50 percent
— we have a lower level of trade in Africa. In Europe, it’s about 70
percent and so there’s still a great deal of effort to be made at that
level. But for this, we have to fulfill a certain number of prerequisites.

First of all, there’s infrastructure. Then there’s security, but also,
quite simply, when it comes to convergence, convergence is very important.
Basically today, we’re in a system where we have developing countries at
different levels and there are some countries that are particularly
advanced. I could mention large countries such as Nigeria, other countries
such as Morocco, or South Africa; and then come intermediate countries,
such as Senegal and other countries, who have to be pushed towards a better
management of public finances.

And so, I spoke about we represent infrastructure, but there’s also another
important element which we have to address and that is the question of
security. Without security, we will not be able to work and to move towards
that free trade area that we all wish for because we would have to boost
inter-African trade, especially since today we’re subject to international
challenges. We spoke about this earlier yesterday when we listened to the
reports of our representatives at the Bank and at the Fund.

We realize that we are moving towards a trade crisis which would
necessarily have repercussions for Africa. And so, in those conditions, we
have to have measures at our level so that we will not suffer that much,
but we’ll have a certain degree of resilience and to continue to
participate in the global economic system.

And so, I think I’ll stop there, and I’ll await questions. Thank you.

MR. VILKAS: Thank you, Minister. I will now give the floor to Mr. Dhehbi.

MR. DHEHBI: Thank you very much. Well, I’d like to thank you. I think that
African integration is an opportunity for all countries. It’s an enormous
market. It’s more than 1.2 billion inhabitants, a GDP of more than $3
trillion, so there’s a huge challenge. But there’s also a major challenge
at the African level, a challenge when it comes to the coordination of
economic policies; there’s the challenge of removing obstacles and
barriers. Now, a symbol of those obstacles are the borders that exist
between those 55 different countries.

As for my country, we have ‑‑ in Mauritania we have signed a partnership
agreement with ECOWAS. And in the 2020 budget, we are currently working on
our customs tariffs that we also ratified the agreement on the free trade
zone, but we have enormous challenges at the international level.

READ ALSO  Democratic Republic of Congo and IMF Mission Reach an Agreement ad-referendum on Financial Assistance Under the Rapid Credit Facility and a Staff-Monitored Program

First of all, we have a low rate of foreign trade specialization and there
we have a great deal of progress to be done. There are also important
adjustments that need to be made.

Now, from a general point of view, we have a great deal to learn from the
international experience of economic zones and economic cooperation. And in
particular, for these agreements and for this integration, there is
complementarity, but we need to coordinate economic policies and economic
structures to be able to implement these agreements.

We need public investment programs which are substantial and aimed at
improving economic competitiveness within the framework of complementarity.
We also need to take into account the dimension ‑‑ we have to take into
account the strategies of the different international players and
Pan-African players. We are also facing challenges from a development point
of view, certain sectors that are exposed to competition such as
agriculture, livestock, as well as labor-intensive industries in different
countries.

Now, from the point of view of commodities, Africa is a reservoir of
commodities, of raw materials, and there we have the African mining vision.
We have IDA. There are several documents that have to be looked at in the
light of new challenges and national strategies have to be a part of those
documents and initiatives.

I think I’m going to stop there. Thank you very much.

MR. VILKAS: Thank you, Minister. The last word for the Minister, Mr.
Kanacho, please.

MR. KANACHO: Yeah, thank you very much. I think globally, we see an
emergence of trade tensions threatening to reverse the gains that have been
achieved so far all over quite a number of regions. But we are pleased to
note that in African, trends are quite different. The African free trade
was recently launched. We believe that integration of Africa will portend
great opportunity for the region, increase inter-trade within African
countries with a potential benefit increasing trade by more than 50
percent.

This undoubtedly will bring better opportunities in terms of portend better
growth, jobs creation, and poverty reduction. The case of East African
community has been a very big success. We just had massive progress by
realizing more wider market. There’s joint prosperity for all the countries
and also an opportunity to nurture young industries.

But we’ve also realized that over time challenges do still exist. There are
certain non-trade barriers that are still quite common. The cost of
transport of goods within these regions is also in direct protection of
infant industries without really knowing nonconventional ways of trying to
pull down on the successes in an attempt to protect young industries
because every country assumes the same objective of manufacturing. It’s
really important that they need to leverage goods and services. That should
not be the only compelling reason. You need to liberate service industry by
setting certain standards when compensating labor and also having similar
practices, labor practices.

There’s need for continuous investment or major facilitative services as
are pending in parts of East Africa, especially Kenya. We know a joint
operation in addressing issues of ICT infrastructure. We’re also coming up
with economic zones to facilitate, you know, trade and investments in those
areas. Overall, the future’s quite bright. But we need to maintain so that
we would not actually go to danger or not creating tensions between the
various countries because it can be very big danger to further integration.
I thank you.

MR. VILKAS: Thank you very much, Ministers. So, now, we will have the time
for questions. Please introduce yourself and the media you are
representing. We’re going to start with the lady here in the second row in
red, please.

QUESTIONER: Hi, Andrea Shalal with Reuters. I wanted to ask each of you to
sort of say a few words about the impact on the continent in your
individual economies of these global trade tensions. I know its kind of
been the backdrop for these meetings is the impact of the U.S.-China trade
war and other tensions on the global economy. So, are you seeing specific
impacts and to what extent could they even be positive impacts? For
instance, in the case of Kenya, you know — or other countries, are you
seeing perhaps an opportunity there to collect some of the supply chain
work that has previously been very focused on China. So that would be the
first question

And the second question is if you are looking at this multilateral
institution now that we are here, do you see continued strength, or are
there attacks on this sort of notion of multilateral work because of the
U.S. decision to pull out of various multilateral organizations. Thank you.
And what does that mean for your countries?

MR. VILKAS: Thank you very much. I believe that’s a question to all of the
Ministers, but I heard that Kenya was mentioned so maybe we’ll start from
the Kenyan Minister. Please?

MR. KANACHO: I think regarding the impact of global tensions now on various
local economies in my view it’s really best described, it depends on the
prevailing trade agreement between – our own unions, rather than naturally
either taking advantage, or trying to see whether the tension is going to
bear fruits in terms of pertaining new opportunities. But it will basically
be dictated by the prevailing arrangements that we have was either China or
America, or whatever.

MR. VILKAS: Okay. Please.

MR. DHEBBI: Well, we are not going to finance trade wars to be able to take
advantage of it, and we shouldn’t exaggerate that, we shouldn’t finance
trade wars between the U.S. and China to take advantage of it, but I think
it’s an opportunity. It’s an unfortunate opportunity, but an interesting
one.

Having said that, we know that Africa combines both raw materials or
commodities and a reservoir of labor. I think this is a new situation that
we really have to take advantage of. Now, afterwards I know that there are
— there is the offshoring of industries in the developed world because
unemployment is quite a pressing issue, but I think that Africa is the
final destination for capital for the two assets that I’ve mentioned. I
think that it’s a good omen for the future.

MR. DIALLO: Yes, of course we are going to have to experience the
consequences of that global tension especially when it comes to energy,
that’s very important. And if things evolve in a certain way today, it’s
going to have an impact on our economy, but the other important element are
consequences on the financial markets have that and will necessarily have
an impact as well on our situations and the funds that we’ll be able to
obtain.

But having said that today, you know, the free trade agreement has come at
the right time, because basically in Africa we have to work to develop a
certain degree of resilience. I said that earlier and that’s very
important. We are the only ones who, together, can tackle that difficulty.

The difficulty, as I said, is infrastructure, generally speaking, whether
it be transportation, ports of security. But the other difficulty is our
low rate of industrialization. Unfortunately, we are still dependent on the
global system, the European and Asian system. So, we have to take advantage
of that difficulty to move towards a massive industrialization of our
economies to be able to remain and have a significant capacity for
resilience.

And the last element, is the possibility of offshoring, that could an
opportunity for us, and it’s going to happen in certain group of countries.
China, for a long time, was a fertile area in that respect, and Mauritania
mentioned this earlier. We have labor in Africa, we have commodities, and
so I think it’s the right time, and this is the perfect time to be able to
take advantage of that, and to move towards a massive industrialization.
Thank you.

MR. BEILEH: As you all know, Somalia is not a major player in the
international trade as I explained earlier, but of course the discussions
that are taking place between the U.S. and China, two very important
players in the international market, may have some consequences at the
later stage.

I think it’s too early to say what that impact would be, but as far as
Somalia is concerned, I think we have much more challenges than we are
dealing with now, than trade. And really, I would say, we import a few food
items, and we are not really a major player, so I have not sensed any
impact of any international disturbances; neither the international
institutions, nor international trade. Thank you.

MR. VILKAS: Thank you. The lady here in the first row.

QUESTIONER: I’m Pearl Matibe with NewsDay Zimbabwe. Thank you very
much. I think it’s commendable that we’ve got Foreign Ministers here that
are making themselves available to the press. So, thank you very much for
being available.

My question to you is, with the next phase of AfCFTA, where do you see your
countries in terms of dealing with the other African countries like
Zimbabwe that have got currency issues, and at times no currency? We know
where the RTGS is at the moment; what are the plans in terms of phasing
some of these low-income, fragile countries? Thank you very much.

READ ALSO  Unge har på 10 år halveret deres restskat

MR. VILKAS: Do you have a specific Minister in mind you want to answer, or
all the Ministers?

QUESTIONER: Thank you for giving the opportunity to clarify. I would like
to have an opinion from each, if that’s possible.

MR. VILKAS: Okay. Maybe we can start from you now?

MR. BEILEH: Okay. Okay. Thank you very much. You spoke about, you know,
countries trading and how they will deal with fragile states, and that’s
where I come, as far as Somalia is concerned. You also spoke about the
currency issues, and that also affects Somalia. Somalia is a multi-currency
country now, even though mobile money is taking over everything. Mobile
money is taking over everything, I think more than any other country in
Africa.

We have the dollar — like you, like Zimbabwe, we also have the Somali
shilling, and we are trying to keep it that way for the time being because
we have not seen any major problems. Anybody who wants a shilling will have
the shilling, and anybody who wants the dollar, have the dollar, for the
time being.

Now, trade of course, we’ll have to trade with currencies that are
acceptable, I’m thinking about our neighbors, you know, trading with a
neighbor. I think you should start with your neighbor. And we have the
possibility of trading with them, whatever we can trade with them, with the
currencies that they have, and our currencies, and we did not have any
constraint, so to speak, as far as the currencies are concerned. Thank you.

MR. DIALLO: Yes, I would say that in Senegal, we are members of two unions
that are important, a monetary union in which there are eight countries,
and we are also in ECOWAS, 15 countries; so, we don’t have any essentially
difficulty for trading with any of the African countries. Our currencies
are known. The important currency in the region is the U.S. dollar. The
currency of Nigeria, Ghana, and other countries are there, and we don’t
have any difficulties in working, essentially, with Zimbabwe in that sense.
Thank you.

MR. DHEBI: The monetary issue is important, there are target monetary areas
in Africa, the evolution of the agreement was just made. There will be
stages, and obviously monetary unions require greater stages, it’s greater
than just free change, but — free exchange or free trade agreements, but I
believe that it’s going to require greater convergence, and why not a
common currency in the future. Thank you.

MR. KANACHO: I think from us, we need to realize that you know, as African
countries we must take charge of our own destiny, and we must take it our
self to grow, trade it in ourselves. We also have a duty of care and
obligation to nurture countries in all type of situations. We are not all
at the same level. There are certain countries with transitional issues.
So, we must, indeed, take upon our self as an obligation to support. And we
must also have trade in our own currencies. Because of convertibility,
because of acceptability, it is really important we have faith and, you
know, trade using our own currencies.

Importantly enough for Kenya, we must realize that we are the pioneer in
the idea of money transfer through M-Pesa. It has really eased financial
support. It has improved inclusivity and include multi-rural economy.
Through that, we are able to connect every citizen to the financial
systems. And that is very exciting and that is how we need to support our
own systems so that we can find value in non-exchangeable goods and
services using our own currency so that we can grow, but the ultimate
reason is just we think of our monetary unit, even it is going to take 50,
100 years to come.

MR. VILKAS: Thank you. The lady in the second row, here.

MS. BONORCHIS: Good afternoon. My name is Renee, I’m with Bloomberg News.
My question goes to the Somali Minister and the Acting Treasury Secretary
of Kenya.

How does the current border dispute — the maritime border dispute —
between your two countries affect the implementation of a freer trade,
especially now that the case around the dispute has been postponed to next
year?

MR. VILKAS: Mr. Minister?

MR. BEILEH: Should I start?

MR. VILKAS: Yes.

MR. BEILEH: Okay. I thank you very much for the question. I would really
say that the maritime dispute has not affected our business with Kenya from
what I see. They continue importing a lot of goods and we will continue
exporting whatever we had in the past. So, there is no effect. There was no
effect as far as from where I sit. The maritime dispute is something for
the laws to decide, for the courts to decide, and I think that’s what the
two Presidents agreed in their last meeting.

But I think life goes on. There is no effect on our relationship. Kenya is
a very good neighbor for us and we are dealing with them amicably. Thank
you.

MR. KANACHO: I also confirm that there is no hostility between Kenya and
Somalia. There’s only expression of dispute or disagreement. And we have
full confidence in the international instrument of the court to sit to
decide on how to go. And, whatever the outcome, we are going to respect.

I think we also need to realize that Kenya has, of course, understanding
and misfortune that we failed Somalia over time. Kenya has been acting as
the other brother, giving them all the support in terms of our managing the
humanitarian crisis. We host the biggest refugee camp in the world. And
we’ve done everything most of the humanitarian organizations, financial
institutions, agencies, are — most of them are still operating from
Nairobi — by serving Somalia. We have a duty of care as brother because
nothing is permanent. Situations — they need to be supported.

Whatever disagreement regarding the maritime dispute is unfortunate, but we
have to wait for the court decision and we will be more than glad to abide
by it.

MR. VILKAS: Thank you. The gentleman on the third row here in the blue
shirt.

MR. NODE-LANGLOIS: Good afternoon. I am Fabrice Node-Langlois from the
Newspaper Le Figaro in Paris. As we have two French speakers, I will ask my
questions in French for the ministers.

The Board of Governors of the IMF this morning approved the review process
for quotas. We know that it may be difficult. The U.S. is not in favor of
this. Is this an important situation for your countries? Do you think that
this will turn out well?

Another question that you didn’t answer for my colleague from Reuters,
which is on the state of multilateralism and the threat to multilateralism.
Thank you.

MR. VILKAS: Thank you. So, the first question was addressed more to the
French colleagues? To all of them? Okay.

Perhaps we could start with the Minister from Senegal, Mr. Diallo.

MR. NODE-LANGLOIS: Do you want me to repeat the question?

MR. DIALLO: Yes.

MR. NODE-LANGLOIS: In French? In English?

MR. DIALLO: In French.

MR. NODE-LANGLOIS: Yes. I was talking about the review of the quotas for
IMF member countries given that more weight is going to be given to
emerging countries. But we know it’s a complicated process that will
perhaps be blocked by the U.S., and I wanted to hear what you thought of
it. Thank you.

MR. DIALLO: Thank you. That is necessarily a question that is directed to
us because we’re all partners in a structure, the IMF — in the IMF. And we
need to be states on an equal footing.

I don’t think despite the differences amongst the states economically, they
are still independent and sovereign states. And as of that, I don’t think
we need — we can say that the same voice or one single voice for each
state, but I think that each state has the possibility of influencing in
terms of their role, particularly for developing countries. Thank you.

MR. DHEHBI: On the matter of quotas, this is a very old re-vindication
about majority of countries, and in African countries representativeness is
quite weak. So clearly, I think that this is a struggle that must be
continued. I think that economic agreements at the Pan-African level, since
the policies follow the economy, I think from here to there it’s not a
given, but rather the basis is trade, opening borders. Then we have to
follow economic lines and then moving onward from there and ending perhaps
into a monetary union, perhaps following the European path. It’s a long
path. I think that we need to learn from the experiences of other more
distant states, if you will.

There are panels and experts that deal with this, but the idea underlying
this is to, within international organizations, to have a weighting of the
states, but the voices — or rather the votes — and the properties
afforded to each one is the way it is set up.

READ ALSO  Democratic Republic of Congo and IMF Mission Reach an Agreement ad-referendum on Financial Assistance Under the Rapid Credit Facility and a Staff-Monitored Program

Now, with respect to multilateralism, it’s the same matter. We need more
multilateralism to better govern the world. It’s clear. I think that Africa
has a great responsibility. I think within the instances of the African
Union that matter is discussed to a great extent in Ministries of Foreign
Affairs, but I think that within the African Union we are interested by
multilateralism. It interests us, and we would like to see it fostered to
the greatest extent possible. Thank you.

MR. KANACHO: On multilateralism and the fear that some countries pulling
out or planning to pull out on their multilateral institutions. I think
there is danger because it has potentially put all who live in other
countries under a lot. They may follow suit. And this will kill the spirit
and the dream of effective globalization because with all the benefits and
the free flow of goods and services, and the support or facilitate the role
that multilateral can play in all this may connect in the world. We may run
a danger of diminution, the intended mutation; and at the same time also
provide limited financing; concessions to — so that the other countries
are also brought on board.

I think it’s not a good thing to do, but if it happens then it’s just to
really heap on the benefits by making sure that all other countries remain
firm in multilateralism for their own benefits, for the benefits of the
world, and also to facilitate the desire and the benefits of all this.

MR. VILKAS: Minister, you wanted to comment?

MR. BEILEH: Yes. I wanted to comment on the issue of multilateralism and
say that multilateral institutions, particularly, the financial
multilateral institutions, are those that are linked to UN, these have been
very important for the world. And I really think that while countries can
reduce their ownership or their contribution, I think they have a role to
play, a very, very important role to play; and I think they deserve our
support.

It is our decision, collective decision, to have this institution set up to
address a specific need that we saw at that particular time. I mean what
could we do without the IMF; what can Somalia do without IMF; or the World
Bank; or the African Bank; or these institutions who are collecting funds
from the market because of their AAA; and also, from other countries that
have surpluses to assist countries, as intermediary institutions.

I cannot imagine the world surviving, especially very fragile and less
developed countries, without the support of the bilaterals through their
multilateral institutions.

So, for me, I think these are very important institutions, and we should
support them.

MR. VILKAS: Thank you Ministers. I think we have time for one more
question. The gentleman at the fourth row, there.

MR. NDENGWE: Thank you very much, sir. My name is Francoise Ndengwe of
“Hommes d’Afrique magazine”. One question relating to the — we are here,
the International Monetary Fund, and M stands for money. When you look at
Africa the question to ask is there are almost 40 different currencies; and
if you want to have a trade in an area in which you would trade, you need
the currencies. How is it that — the clearing system is very difficult in
the continent?

For instance, I cannot use — if I want to change the Kenya shillings into
the CFA francs, I have to pass through the dollar or through the euros.
What is being done to facilitate the exchange of currency?

And, if I may, a second question, quickly, to the Kenyan Minister. Sir, the
East African community had started years ago and accelerated the process of
a common currency in your region; but since a few years, we haven’t heard
about it. What’s going on?

And, finally, to the Minister of Senegal. Mr. Minister, there is the ‘Eco’
project, the common currency of ECOWAS was that is to be announced next
year, does that mean that the CFA will be the end because this has been
extended, the deadline has been extended several times.

MR. KANACHO: I fully agree with you that the situation as it is where we
have more than 40 different countries posing a challenge to effective
implementation and the realization of the free trade. But, I think, is a
working arrangement, and through the African Trade Union, the dream is to
have one currency in the long run; but is a working arrangement.

Regarding this African union and the monetary union, we are well on course
and we have many, quite a number of those initial conditions, including,
you know, the debt’s ceilings; including all of the monetary aspects of it.
But we are well on course, and the timeline is still approaching. We have
no doubt, maybe the next five, six years, we’ll have managed.

MR. VILKAS: Thank you Minister. Minister from Somalia, please.

MR. BEILEH: Yes. I need to respond to the dollar and the euro being the
most — the strongest, and the currencies of trade. I think history tells
us that at each time there were currencies that were stronger than others;
and, therefore, it is not strange that we have these two currencies being
the strongest one at this particular point in time.

But as far as trade is concerned, if we start trading with our neighbors,
and their neighbors, I think it is just time when our own currencies will
get the trust by the other countries; and, therefore, an exchange regime
will be put in place. I don’t see why we have to need some other currency
to trade to with Kenya. We have a shilling, and we let the market decide.
They have also a shilling, or Ethiopia, the Birr; as well, there will be
exchanges. There will be exchange on the border. Therefore, I think, this
whole idea is based on our thinking that we are always trading with so far
away countries; and, therefore, one currency has to be the one that’s being
used.

I think we have to put a lot of emphasis on our neighbors, and then their
neighbors. The demand is right there; the supply is in the other country;
and, I think, it’s time that we focused on our — on whether we can trade
and throughout Africa; and that will eliminate in needing a faraway
currencies to be our medium of exchange.

MR. DHEHBI: That matter of currency is very important in trade, but there
is a psychological factor involved. Normally, if we look at objective
economic parameters, there is no need to use the dollar because the U.S.
has the most deficits, trade deficits, et cetera. So, it’s not really the
force or the quality of convergence of the currencies. It’s, rather, I
believe, a psychological matter.

I think that if we work on the convertibility and convergence of
currencies, and the psychological aspect, then we can accelerate the
process for — or under which we will have a single currency. We can go
through the ecu, and account units, et cetera, that require less
convergence. So, the matter of currency, I think, is more of a
psychological barrier than an economic fact, if you will. I think it’s
quite a unique situation, but, I think, that is the case.

MR. DIALLO: Yes, my colleagues, I think it is quite a singular situation
because the matter of currency in trade is essential, of course, we have to
recognize it. At any rate, it’s a matter of exchange reserves, today,
currency reserves. We all have to live in that sense and in the sense of
the convertibility and convergence of our currencies. That is the case.

Everything is pegged or linked to the U.S. dollar today. That is the way it
is. In Senegal, with eight countries, we felt that was not enough for trade
amongst ourselves. We are members of the ECOWAS, which has the economic
union; but we felt that it was necessary to look at this amongst these 15
countries. And that was — with respect to the last question that was asked
us — of us, as well, in 2012, it was the will of heads of state that
worked on that, that wanted that; and, as a result of it, our ministries of
finance had no choice but to work on that and to move forward on it. What
is going to happen? But I don’t know; but we are determined to work towards
achieving that common currency by the year 2020. Thank you very much.

MR. VILKAS: So, this concludes this press conference. Thank you.


IMF Communications Department
MEDIA RELATIONS

PRESS OFFICER: Gediminas Vilkas

Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

@IMFSpokesperson








Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Hold dit netværk orienteret