Numbers & Statistics

Transcript of the Conference Call on the Release of the IMF Staff Report on the First Review under the Extended Fund Facility Arrangement for Pakistan

By  | 

Via IMF (Den Internationale Valutafond)

Transcript of the Conference Call on the Release of the IMF Staff Report on the First Review under the Extended Fund Facility Arrangement for Pakistan







December 23, 2019















Ernesto Ramirez Rigo, Mission Chief for Pakistan, Middle East and Central Asia Department

Olga Stankova, Special Assistant to the Director, Communications Department

 

MS. STANKOVA: Good morning, and good afternoon to those who are joining us
from other time zones. Thank you for joining the call on the First Review
under the Pakistan Expanded Fund Facility Arrangement. As you know, the IMF
Executive Board discussed the review last week. I will now turn the call
over to the Mission Chief for Pakistan, Ernesto Ramirez Rigo. I would like
also to remind you that this call, and the documents that you have
available now under embargo, will made public at 10:00 a.m. Washington,
D.C. time.

MR. RAMIREZ RIGO: Thank you, Olga. Good afternoon, for those joining us
from Pakistan, and good morning for those that are joining us in our time
zone.

I would like us to start with some quick remarks and a summary of how we
see things at the completion of the first review. And then obviously as
Olga explained, I will be happy to answer your questions.

So, as a summary description I would say that program implementations have
been on track for the first review. All the performance criteria for the
targets of the first quarter were met or exceeded, in particular those on
the external sector, foreign currency reserves and NDA, likewise on the
fiscal side.

Having said that, the economic outlook remains unchanged relative to what
we had at the time of the program approval within the deceleration of
economic activity as was expected at the time of program approval, with
only two revisions ; one revision for inflation, which we have slightly
lower in part because some of the pass through from the exchange rate
adjustments has been more moderate than we anticipated.

And at the same time, we have also made some adjustment to the
export-import composition of the current account, but without any major
substantial changes in the total current account deficit share of GDP that
we expect to see this year.

READ ALSO  IMF Executive Board Concludes 2019 Article IV Consultation with the Republic of Tajikistan

Beyond that what really matters is that the first review, or like any other
review of a Fund program, requires two components. One, is what I mentioned
at the beginning (the performance criteria for the quarter). And secondly,
and more important, is the forward-looking component in terms of the
policies that the authorities are committed to.

In that sense, and that is really what was the key for the review, we see
that the authorities remain strongly committed to all the objectives of the
program. We are now at the stage in the program where we move to the area
of structural reforms. These ones are really important to build an
institutional framework for the country so that there is no repetition of
the boom bust cycles of the past.

I would like to highlight three areas where we think it is important that
things continue to progress. One, the quality of the fiscal adjustment,
while we have already started to see improvements on the fiscal accounts,
it is very important that this improvement is based on better underpinning
for it to be permanent. And that will require continued work on the tax
revenue side, rather than just on total revenue increases, or containing
expenditure.

As you probably recall at the time of approval of the programs, the design
of this program is based on tax revenue mobilization and not so much on
reducing expenditures. This strategy is because our assessment is that
Pakistan is still lacking in the area of development spending, such as
infrastructure, and we feel that it is very important that fiscal space is
created to meet this development needs.

So, the quality of fiscal adjustment will start to have a larger and larger
focus in the program. That will of course include tax policy reforms,
something that will be of relevance for the following year budget. And then
one other structural area which supplement the fiscal adjustment, is
tackling the issue of circular debt in the energy sector. The authorities
have put together a comprehensive strategy to address the flow and now this
strategy has started to be implemented, that will be the purpose for our
forthcoming reviews.

READ ALSO  IMF Executive Board Completes First Review Under the Policy Coordination Instrument (PCI) and Monetary Policy Consultation for Rwanda

Likewise, there is need for the NEPRA Legislation, that is regulators for
the energy sector, to have more automaticity and the capacity to implement
when necessary (inaudible) to support the reduction in circular debt.
That’s something that is a benchmark for the end of December, and we look
forward to look at those reforms. And of course, very important to us, is
the independence of the Central Bank, the legislation now is a structural
— submitted legislation is now a structural benchmark for March.

This was originally set for the end of December 2019, but our technical
team in the Legal Department, after looking at the necessary changes, and
in consultation with the authorities we decided to spend some more time
working on this to provide technical assistance, and we set the benchmark
so that it would be more feasible, and still very ambitious, but more
feasible.

And I think I will leave it at that. And Olga, if it’s okay with you, we
can start taking questions.

MS. STANKOVA: Certainly, thank you, Ernesto. Steven, would you please,
proceed with the questions, if there’s any.

QUESTIONER: I have been following this closely, but just a quick question.
I’m wondering, there’s a big gap between the Staff approval in July and the
— sorry — in November, and the Board approval just last week. Was there
some delay in getting some of the measures implemented?

MS. STANKOVA: Yes, Ernesto.

MR. RAMIREZ RIGO: Thank you, Olga. No, there were no delays of any kind,
it’s just simply the process, the time that it takes internally in the Fund
to get the documents to the Board. And just so that everybody understands,
following the staff-level agreement which it is between the staff and the
authorities, we have to prepare the documents which go through an internal
review process that normally takes about a couple of weeks to be completed
once management approves. It would be at that moment in which management
says it’s okay to do everything that is presented to them.

Then the document is issued to our IMF Board, which requires a minimum
calculation period of two weeks. So that gives you an idea of the time
frame that it takes to produce these documents. So, I think the fact that
we manage to get to Board on December 19 was pretty good time considering
all our internal processes.

READ ALSO  IMF Executive Board Approves Decisions to Implement a Package on Resources and Governance Reform

QUESTIONER: I’m just wondering what is the most concerning issue at this
stage, still, for the Pakistan economy?

MR. RAMIREZ RIGO: Do you mean —

QUESTIONER: Concerning issues, according to you, at this stage of — the
reform program had started, but what is the most concerning points
according to you?

MR. RAMIREZ RIGO: Well, what we have seen so far is a major improvement in
the external position of Pakistan that was one of the objectives of the
program. A very smooth transition to market-determined exchange rate, it
was also a major component of the program. So those are areas where we feel
that the program is delivering very good early results.

On the fiscal side, I think it’s an area where we will have to employ more
of our time in the months to come. It’s an area where it’s not just about
the improvement on the total — on the headline number on the fiscal
headline number, it is about the quality. But we want to be very mindful to
minimize the impact of the adjustments on economic growth, this is why we
also put the emphasis on tax revenue rather than expenditure, which
normally comes with larger multipliers.

We calibrated that very carefully, but we want to see more tax revenue
mobilization, and that’s an area which is not easy, it’s very tough, there
are many political economic issues around that. And that’s where we think
it’s an area of concern that we should continue to make progress there.

MS. STANKOVA: All right. Thank you for joining the call. Just a reminder
that the call is under embargo along with the documents until 10:00 a.m.
D.C. Time, and if you have any questions during this period please feel
free to follow up with the phone now, and after this — before it is
public.

MR. RAMIREZ RIGO: Thank you.


IMF Communications Department
MEDIA RELATIONS

PRESS OFFICER: Olga Stankova

Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

@IMFSpokesperson








Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Hold dit netværk orienteret