Financial news

Price trends over the product lifecycle and monetary policy

By  | 

Via VOX EU

Consumer goods prices systematically depend on product age. This column analyses this dependence and shows that relative prices tend to fall during the product lifecycle. It uses insights from a sticky price framework to demonstrate how these price trends matter for aggregate inflation and the optimal inflation rate

Consumer goods experience constant change. In modern economies, many products are replaced by slightly altered, newer versions within the space of a year (e.g. Broda and Weinstein 2010). Some new products are relatively ex-pensive to begin with and only become cheaper as time goes by. Other prod-ucts are relatively inexpensive at the beginning but become more expensive over their lifetime. How pronounced are these price trends? 

In a recent paper (Adam and Weber 2019), we measure these trends in over 1,000 expenditure categories. In most categories, product prices significantly decrease over the lifetime of products, relative to the average price in the par-ticular category. We integrate this price behaviour into a theoretical model to explore classic monetary policy questions from a new angle: How should a central bank set the optimal inflation rate in a modern economy? How high is this rate and how has it changed over the last few years? 

Measuring price trends

We use almost 30 million price observations at the product level, collected by the UK Office for National Statistics for the general consumer price index for the period from 1996 to 2016. The products are allocated to more than 1,000 expenditure categories such as “milk semi-per 2 pints” or “flat panel TV 26” – 42”. For each category, we divide the price of a particular product by the aver-age price of all products in the category and then calculate how this relative price changes as the age of the product increases. Because we are looking at relative prices and their changes over time, our calculations are not influenced by unobserved product characteristics such as product quality. 

READ ALSO  Lavrov Mocks Media Frenzy Over "Secrets" Exchanged During "Normal" Diplomatic Meeting With Trump

Figure 1 shows that the price trends in most expenditure categories are indeed negative. For instance, a trend of -5% shows that the relative prices fall by 5% per year on average. However, Figure 1 also points to large differences be-tween the expenditure categories. These differences are still evident once the expenditure categories are grouped together. The decline in prices for clothing and footwear (around 280 categories), i.e. for consumer goods with a high news value, is exceptionally strong at over 9% per year. The price decline for food and non-alcoholic beverages (around 150 categories), including skimmed milk, is significantly smaller at 1% per year. By contrast, categories with positive relative price trends are very rare.

Figure 1 Distribution of relative price trends

Source: Deutsche Bundesbank

Price trends and their relevance to monetary policy

Do these price trends have an impact on monetary policy? This depends on how the trends develop. In our theoretical model, negative price trends emerge, inter alia, when products can be manufactured more efficiently over their lifetime as a result of experience accumulation, for instance. This reduces manufacturing costs over the product lifetime, making the product cheaper. Conversely, positive price trends develop at the product level if new products are better than older ones. The quality-adjusted prices of the new products are then comparatively low, meaning that the relative prices of the old products may increase over time. Our theory therefore views empirical price trends as the net effect of the two opposing fundamental forces of manufacturing effi-ciency and product quality. 

One could argue that these forces do not translate directly into the relative price because enterprises are often slow to adjust their nominal prices in order to cut the cost of price adjustment. In our model, we show that this is of sec-ondary importance, however, because the fundamental forces are much more important to enterprises’ profits than price adjustment costs. Enterprises prefer to pay these costs and then have a product price that reflects their current manufacturing efficiency. On aggregate, however, price adjustment costs natu-rally generate losses.

READ ALSO  Oil prices slip as weak China exports highlights trade war impact

Monetary policy can reduce price adjustment costs

Monetary policy can influence how large these losses are. Price adjustment costs do not arise if nominal product prices remain unchanged. At the same time, however, relative prices should fall as products age, in order to reflect the fundamental forces. This can only work if the average price, i.e. the price level, rises. General inflation of this kind is produced if the newly replaced products are relatively expensive – changes to the price of existing products are not necessary for this. 

This leads to a new issue. Perceptible differences in the relative price trends are visible across the expenditure categories (Figure 1). As a result, the ideal increase in the price level also differs across categories. The central bank can only set a general inflation target for all expenditure categories, however, meaning that unavoidable price adjustment costs will arise in some catego-ries. Based on the mechanism considered here, the central bank should there-fore select its target with an eye to keeping overall price adjustment costs as low as possible. We derive a simple and practical rule for doing this: the opti-mal inflation target weights the price decline in one category by its share in to-tal consumer spending. 

Using this simple rule and the price trends already measured, we can estimate the optimal inflation target for the UK. Figure 2 shows that our estimate is 2.6% in 2016, which is not far off the Bank of England’s actual target value (currently 2%). While we only measure the effect of price trends over the product life cy-cle, the Bank of England is – quite rightly – bound to have factored in other as-pects which we have not considered into its current inflation target. Figure 2 also shows that the estimated target has risen by around 1.2 percentage points over the last 20 years. This is mainly because expenditure categories showing a stronger price decline at the product level compared to the existing expenditure categories were newly incorporated into the British consumer price index during this period. 

READ ALSO  Comparative European institutions and the ‘Little Divergence’, 1385–1800

Figure 2 Estimate of optimal inflation target

Source: Deutsche Bundesbank

Conclusion 

Consumer goods prices change considerably over the product lifecycle. These price dynamics have a bearing on the optimal inflation rate. Of course, enter-prises set their prices depending on their competitors. It remains to be seen if and to what extent increasing competition – through internet trade, for instance – will change price dynamics at the product level. However, it is already clear that analysing micro price data will continue to provide useful insights as to macroeconomic price developments and therefore also for monetary policy.

Editors’ note: A German version of this column and the underlying data can be found here.

References

Adam, K and H Weber (2019), “Price trends over the product life cycle and the optimal inflation target”, Bundesbank Discussion Paper No 32/2019. 

Broda, C and D E. Weinstein (2010), “Product Creation and Destruction: Evi-dence and Price Implications”, American Economic Review 100(3): 691-723.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Hold dit netværk orienteret