Markets brace for volatility surge as currencies enter trade war
LONDON (Reuters) – China’s decision to let its yuan plunge through a previously sacrosanct level means a tit-for-tat trade conflict could morph into a currency war, injecting volatility into long-dormant foreign exchanges and piling pressure on world markets.
FILE PHOTO: A U.S. dollar banknote featuring American founding father Benjamin Franklin and a Chinese yuan banknote featuring late Chinese chairman Mao Zedong are seen among U.S. and Chinese flags in this illustration picture taken May 20, 2019. REUTERS/Jason Lee/File Photo
Beijing on Monday allowed the yuan to breach the 7 per dollar level for the first time in 11 years, a move seen as a direct response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s escalation of their trade conflict through more tariffs.
China’s willingness to use its currency to offset the impact of a year-long trade dispute is of huge symbolic, if not economic, importance: it shows Beijing is prepared to use its currency as a tool to respond asymmetrically to Trump’s levies.
For global markets, the move opens up a new front that could dramatically raise volatility in the forex market after a prolonged period of calm, especially if it emboldens others to try to weaken their currencies to shield their economies from a global downturn.
“This is the formal introduction of currencies into the trade war,” said Richard Benson, head of portfolio investments at foreign exchange asset manager Millennium Global.
“If anything, it had been currency stability that was used within the trade war. Now this is an overt, explicit move by the Chinese in response to Trump’s tariffs,” Benson added.
Benson said it had become extremely difficult to predict where currencies were headed from here – economic fundamentals told you to buy the dollar .DXY EUR=EBS, but the risk Trump may hit back encouraged some selling of the greenback.
On Monday, the immediate winners and losers were clear.
The yuan suffered its biggest drop since 2015 CNH=EBS, although analysts noted that the fall seemed orderly and Chinese authorities comfortable with the move so far.
Elsewhere pretty much any country with a small, open economy tied to globalisation saw its currency plunge. Emerging markets were whacked across the board, with steep losses for instance in the trade-sensitive South Korean won KRW=.
The safe-haven Japanese yen JPY=EBS surged to a seven-month high below 106 yen per dollar; Goldman Sachs brought forward its forecast of 103 yen to three months.
Japan’s top currency diplomat warned investors Tokyo was ready to intervene if excessive yen gains threatened to hurt its export-reliant economy.
(For a graphic on global FX performance, month-to-date, click here tmsnrt.rs/2MGSc6i)
(For an interactive version of the above chart click here tmsnrt.rs/2MGu1VI.
Investors say a more dramatic fallout for markets depends on how the United States responded from here. While forex volatility .DBCVIX has risen to its highest in four months, it is barely half of 2016 levels.
Trump has a number of levers at his disposal should he try to weaken the dollar, from leaning on the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates to outright unilateral intervention.
On Monday, he tweeted that China’s “currency manipulation” was a “major violation” which would weaken the country over time. He also asked if the Federal Reserve, which he has frequently attacked for not cutting rates, “was listening”?
Most analysts believe Trump is unlikely to resort to intervention, given this would upend decades of commitment to leave currency markets alone, while the effectiveness of such a move remains highly debatable.
Last month top White House adviser Larry Kudlow said the Trump administration had ruled out intervention, dampening – although not eliminating – market expectations the U.S. would act.
(For a graphic on History of U.S. FX intervention, click here tmsnrt.rs/2YwuRvr)
James Binny, State Street Global Advisors’ global head of currency, said an intervention looked more effective as a “threat in the armoury”. If Washington actually intervened it could backfire – given an attempted devaluation that panicked financial markets would send investors to buy the safety of the dollar.
According to Citi analysts, another 5% or so appreciation in the dollar was necessary before the intervention risk was “live”.
Still, whether or not the U.S. intervenes directly, China’s salvo makes it more likely that countries will increasingly weaponise their currencies in the race to maintain economic competitiveness in a world of slowing growth, fund managers say.
European Central Bank policymakers, for example, have said the strength of the euro is a key reason for signalling more monetary policy easing, sources told Reuters ahead of such a move last month.
The Swiss National Bank appears to be buying foreign currency once again as the trade tensions pushed the value of its safe-haven franc to two-year highs against the euro EURCHF=EBS, currency of its biggest trading partner.
China’s massive role in global trade also means moves in the yuan reverberate much more powerfully and widely than they once did.
The yuan is the biggest component in the euro’s trade-weighted index, and a weakening yuan comes at a time when the euro zone economy cannot cope with it, noted Kit Juckes, a strategist at Societe Generale.
(For a graphic on the yuan: a leader and follower of global FX, click here tmsnrt.rs/2YlZSSy)
Millennium’s Benson said he was steering clear of emerging currencies and reckoned the yen could rally to 105 per the dollar. The “big number” for many in the market was 100 yen, he said, a level last hit in 2016.
Commerzbank analysts said: “Over the short term, we believe that the market will remain extremely volatile and the risk for both the economy and yuan are biased to the downside.
“The market implications of breaching 7.0 (yuan per dollar) are tremendous,” Commerzbank analysts added. “We will see a new wave of depreciation among Asian currencies in the foreseeable future and there could be further risk-off movements in the global markets.
“All told, we are in a messy market.”
Additional reporting by Marc Jones and Olga Cotaga; Graphics by Ritvik Carvalho; Editing by David Holmes