Ever since Reuters reported last week that Kodak had granted its Chairman, Jim Continenza, some 1.75 million options (in what appears to be less than an “arms-length deal” and as the result of what was called an understanding” with the Board of Directors), just one day before the infamous $765 million loan from the government was announced on July 28, which was meant to transform the one-time photography titan (since bankrupt) into a China supply-chain alternative to produce pharmaceutical products in Rochester and at the company’s facility in St. Paul, Minnesota, and which sent its stock price from $2 to $60 in two days….

… making the Kodak chairman richer by tens of millions overnight, the stench of impropriety was spreading, sparking demands from Democrats for a probe of potential backroom dealings between the Trump administration and Continenza, and culminating with an alleged SEC probe last week into the legitimacy of the deal.

And now, just ten days later, it appears that the entire deal is on the verge of collapse with the government’s International Development Finance Corporation tweeting late on Friday that…

… the same IDFC which on July 28 released a statement quoting Continenza as saying: “Kodak will play a critical role in the return of a reliable American pharmaceutical supply chain.”

Trump, too, had hailed the development. “I want to congratulate the people in Kodak,” he said at a press briefing. “They’ve been working very hard.” It was Trump’s encouragement that sparked the furious rally in KODK stock and a frenzied scramble by Robinhood traders to buy up every share they could find, even if as the chart below show, the euphoria has clearly peaked.

READ ALSO  Facebook announces curbs on internal debate of political issues

Peter Navarro, director of the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, tweeted that he is very disappointed that last week’s deal with Kodak was tarnished by allegations.

Last Friday, Kodak announced that it will appoint a special committee to conduct an internal review of the process surrounding the company’s agreement, although if the IDFC is indeed putting the deal on hold that may well be moot; the only question is whether any insiders and funds that liquidated stock and generated impressive overnight profits will be forced to clawback their gains.


Via Zerohedge