“I want to end it if the pain gets unbearable,” 63-year-old Melanie S. tells Lukas Radbruch, a doctor at University Hospital Bonn, who has also been serving as the president of the German Association for Palliative Medicine since 2014. She has end-stage lung cancer, and fears she could suddenly lose the ability to swallow and this suffocate while fully conscious. This possibility has led Melanie S. to consider assisted suicide.
But so far, paragraph 217 of Germany’s criminal code prohibits assisted suicide. The law was adopted in 2015 by Germany’s parliament, the Bundestag, to prevent associations or individuals from turning suicide into a kind of business. Specifically, the law states that “anyone who, with the intention of assisting another person to commit suicide, provides, procures or arranges the opportunity for that person to do so and whose actions are intended as a recurring pursuit incurs a penalty of imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or a fine.” Legal experts have since hotly debated whether the law also criminalizes consultations — or merely mentioning, for example, that one may end one’s life by foregoing food.
Traveling abroad to die with dignity
As a result, individuals who until 2015 had facilitated assisted suicides ceased doing so. And doctors and staff working in hospices became too scared to even consult patients on this possibility. Consequently, many terminally ill individuals traveled to Switzerland or the Netherlands instead, where even active assisted suicide through a third party is legal.
Anyone too weak or without the financial means to embark on such a journey, however, found themselves forced to ask family members to help them end their suffering. Family members who did meet this final wish were not prosecuted. But who would want to burden a close relative or loved one to assist in one’s suicide?
Medical ethics expert Wolfgang Putz advocates liberalizing legal prescriptives on assisted suicide
Many terminally ill individuals were deeply dissatisfied with this legal situation. Along with a number of medical professionals, they then took to Germany’s highest court to challenge paragraph 217. Wolfgang Putz, an expert in medical ethics, told DW he believes the current legal situation regarding assisted suicides is untenable and must be reformed: “Germany’s [Protestant and Catholic] church still exert significant influence on political decision-makers, even though we live in a secular state.”
The Protestant and Catholic churches in Germany reject all forms of assisted suicide. Putz therefore welcomes the fact that Germany’s highest court, the country’s supreme legal institution, could now strengthen the constitutionally guaranteed right to self-determination with regard to suicide.
The potential of palliative care
The president of the German Association for Palliative Medicine, Lukas Radbruch, knows that it is essential to emphasize with and listen carefully to patients who are considering assisted suicide. In his experience, when ever someone inquires about this possibility, this is often a cry for help to end one’s suffering. When ever he then suggests pain-relieving sedative drugs, terminally ill patients gladly opt for this possibility.
But he also warns that “if the constitutional court rules to scrap paragraph 217, this could embolden individuals who assist with suicides and that could be a dangerous development for society.” He fears that many terminally ill individuals would then chose assisted suicide so as not to burden anyone. And he stresses that nobody must ever feel pressured into taking such a step. In his opinion, assisted suicide should always be an absolute last resort.
Palliative care provider Lukas Radbruch can only provide pain-relieving assistance and sedatives to terminally ill patients
How will Germany’s top court decide?
Most observers predict that Germany’s top court will rule that paragraph 217 is incompatible with the constitution. If this happens, assisted suicide would once more be possible in Germany, as it previously was. Doctors would again be permitted to counsel patients about this option and provide them with lethal drugs, yet not administer them.
Uwe-Christian Arnold was one of Germany’s leading assisted suicide advocates since the mid-1990s. The Berlin urologist, who died in April 2019, once accused German law-makers and healthcare decision-makers of a pre-Enlightenment mindset when he asked: “How can people, who have never been afflicted by a serious illness themselves, be so brazen as to judge whether a person’s life is still worth living?” He was convinced that terminally ill individuals, who are mentally healthy and have an autonomous mind, should be permitted to choose whether or not they want to end their lives in dignity. Arnold’s role in helping others commit suicide, meanwhile, meant he constantly violated the Hippocratic Oath and thus risked losing his German medical license.
Arnold was repeatedly taken to court for his role in facilitating assisted suicides, and acquitted every time. He has said that he assisted over 100 individuals across Germany in ending their own lives — after, of course, thoroughly vetting their mental ability to make this choice.
Physician Uwe-Christian Arnold accompanied terminally ill patient Ingrid S. for years before assisting her in choosing to die with dignity
Arnold was one of the plaintiffs who called on Germany’s top court to review the legality of paragraph 217. He had been scheduled to give a 5-minute statement before the court regarding his role in facilitating assisted suicides in April 2019. The president of Germany’s constitutional court, Andreas Vosskuhle, had specifically asked Arnold to speak before the court to learn in which life situations patients express the desire to commit suicide and how physicians deal with such wishes. But Arnold, who suffered from bone marrow cancer, passed away before he could address the court.
Uwe-Christian Arnold’s lawyer was permitted to read out a statement by the deceased physician. Arnold was skeptical that the court would actually scrap paragraph 217. But should the court see fit to do so, it would not just grant the late doctor’s wish, but come as a relief to countless people suffering with an unimaginable dilemma.
If you are suffering from emotional strain or suicidal thoughts, seek professional help. You can find information on where to find help, no matter where you live in the world, at this website: www.befrienders.org