Via Financial Times

The UK, France and Germany have triggered a dispute mechanism in the 2015 nuclear agreement with Iran, taking their most robust response yet to Tehran’s decision to no longer abide by the uranium enrichment limits set in the accord. 

The European move pushes the accord closer to collapse and comes amid escalating diplomatic tensions between the west and the Islamic republic. 

Any party to the accord can trigger the dispute resolution mechanism if they believe a signatory is in violation of the deal.

The move could ultimately lead to the reimposition of UN sanctions on the republic. European diplomats say they are not yet at that stage and insist they are still working to save the deal, which is deemed critical to restricting Tehran’s ability to develop the capacity to build nuclear weapons. 

But they also want to register their concern over Iran’s announcement this month that it would end limits on the number of centrifuges used for enrichment. Tehran took the decision — which means it no longer abides by any of its commitments on uranium enrichment — days after a US drone strike killed Qassem Soleimani, Iran’s most powerful military commander. 

The nuclear accord’s signatories — which also include China and Russia — will now meet within 15 days to discuss their concerns. Diplomats describe the mechanism’s process as “flexible” and “extendable” and it could drag on for months. 

France, the UK and Germany — the so-called E3 — have been battling to save the deal since Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew the US from the accord in 2018 and imposed crippling economic sanctions on Iran. The decision to trigger the dispute mechanism comes as Tehran is threatening to kick out the UK ambassador, alleging the British diplomat participated in an illegal anti-government gathering in the Iranian capital.

READ ALSO  Housing Shortage Gets Worse | Seeking Alpha

Iran has been increasing its nuclear activity in stages since May as it complains that it is no longer receiving the economic benefits it was promised when it signed up to the deal. 

Under the accord, the Islamic regime agreed to curb its atomic activity in return for many western sanctions being lifted, but Washington’s punitive measures have strangled its ability to export oil and driven the republic into its worst recession for decades. 

The Trump administration’s “maximum pressure” policy has heightened tensions across the region, with Washington accusing Tehran of conducting attacks on Saudi Arabia’s oil infrastructure and tankers in the Gulf. 

The E3 share the US’s concerns about Iran’s support for regional militant groups and the development of its ballistic missile programme. But they believe the nuclear deal is vital to avoiding a regional arms race, preventing Tehran moving closer to having the capacity to develop nuclear weapons and maintaining diplomatic channels with the republic. 

The US sanctions have, however, stymied their efforts to keep open finance and trade lines with Iran to ease the economic pressure on the regime, while Tehran’s frustrations with the deal have mounted. 

Iran says it is still committed to the accord, and has continued to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency, the watchdog, to monitor its nuclear activity. It says that all the steps it has taken, including increasing its stockpile of enriched uranium and ramping up its nuclear research and development, are reversible if the republic receives the economic benefits it expects. 

READ ALSO  Toxic side effects of coronavirus weaken global pension systems

Tehran’s main concern is its ability to sell its oil, the lifeline of the economy, as US sanctions have reduced its exports from about 2.8m barrels a day in May to less than 500,000 bpd. 

Robert Malley, president of the International Crisis Group, branded the European decision a “mistake” that could have the “unintended consequence” of strengthening hardliners in Iran who wanted to junk the deal. 

“It’s a mistake because it doesn’t really gain them anything,” he said. “The more they go down that road, the more they risk losing Iran and the more they risk pushing Iran in a completely different direction.”

Mr Malley, who helped negotiate the nuclear deal as an Obama administration official, said the Europeans now needed to use the process “smartly” to create space for talks with Iran running up to and even beyond the US presidential election in November. 

But he warned: “Once you invoke this, a clock starts ticking and the message to Iran is ‘you are moving away from us.’”