Via Financial Times

The US Federal Reserve has finalised a new set of rules that will allow many banks to reduce their capital and liquid assets, prompting a dissent from one governor who warned that the changes “increased risk to financial stability”.

Jay Powell, Fed chair, announced on Thursday the regulator had completed its proposals on so-called bank “tailoring”, which will see different banks required to comply with different rules based on their size and complexity.

Mr Powell said in a statement: “The rules maintain the fundamental strength and resiliency that has been built into our financial system over the past decade.

“Congress and the American people rightly expect us to achieve an effective and efficient regulatory regime that keeps our financial system strong and protects our economy, while imposing no more burden than is necessary.”

Mr Powell was opposed by Lael Brainard, who was appointed to the Fed’s board by former president Barack Obama. Ms Brainard said in a statement: “Today’s actions go beyond what is required by law and weaken the safeguards at the core of the system before they have been tested through a full cycle.

“At a time when the large banks are profitable and providing ample credit, I see little benefit to the banks or the system from the proposed reduction in core resilience that would justify the increased risk to financial stability in the future.”

READ ALSO  Canada must ‘respect’ decision to cancel Keystone XL, minister says

The changes mean that all but the largest and most complex banks will be subject to lower liquidity and capital requirements. Smaller and less complex banks will collectively have to hold a total of 0.6 per cent less in capital and 2 per cent less in liquid assets than before.

The rules will also allow some large regional US banks to avoid having to undergo annual stress tests. And when a bank does complete a stress test it will no longer have to model what would happen to its assets under an “adverse” scenario — though they will still have to model the worst-case “very adverse” scenario.

The rules mean that no foreign bank will have to comply with the most stringent liquidity requirements, following heavy lobbying from the banks in question. Instead they will only have to hold enough liquid reserves to cover a maximum of 25.5 days of operations, rather than the 30 that has been imposed on some domestic firms.

In a major victory for foreign banks, the Fed decided not to proceed with a suggestion that it should unilaterally impose liquidity requirements on foreign bank branches, as well as on their holding companies.

Instead, Randal Quarles, the Fed’s head of banking supervision, said he wanted the international Financial Stability Board to agree such a rule instead.

Mr Powell said: “US regulators have a longstanding policy of treating foreign banks the same as we treat domestic banks. That is the fair thing to do. It also helps US banks, because banking is a global business, and a level playing field at home helps to level the playing field for US banks when they compete abroad.”

READ ALSO  Plastic makers bet on new waste recovery technologies