Via Financial Times

Barclays is preparing to start the search for a new chief executive to replace Jes Staley, making it the latest European bank to look for new leadership at a time of upheaval in the industry’s top ranks.

Mr Staley, 63, who has led the bank since December 2015, has told colleagues he expects to leave the group by the end of next year, according to two people briefed on the bank’s plans. He could stand down at the annual meeting in May 2021, they added. 

A rough timetable for Mr Staley’s departure was in place before Britain’s top financial regulators recently launched an investigation into his ties to Jeffrey Epstein, the paedophile financier. But one of the people said the probe had “focused minds” on the bank’s board of directors and injected a sense of urgency into the process. 

This month Barclays said Mr Staley was being investigated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Bank of England’s Prudential Regulation Authority over the way he had characterised his relationship with Epstein, who committed suicide last year while awaiting trial on charges that he sex-trafficked underage girls.

Barclays’ board, led by chairman Nigel Higgins, is about to appoint an external headhunting firm — probably Spencer Stuart or Egon Zehnder — to identify potential external successors given the lack of internal candidates, the people said. The process could take up to a year — six months for the search and the same again to allow the candidate to fulfil any gardening leave requirements, they added. 

The search comes amid a flurry of changes at the top of European banks, with UBS, Credit Suisse and Royal Bank of Scotland recently appointing new chief executives. HSBC is also searching for a new CEO, while ING plans to appoint a new leader by the autumn. 

READ ALSO  The missing successor - China’s most senior officials endorse economic plans for years ahead | China

The Barclays search will focus on executives with experience of investment banking because the London-based lender derives roughly half its revenue from its corporate and investment bank, the people said. 

However, one of the people warned that the bank could struggle to attract candidates from the US — which has the deepest pool of investment banking executives — because bankers there tend to be paid significantly more. 

A large chunk of their pay is usually awarded in the form of deferred stock that tends to be forfeited if they resign to work for a rival, meaning Barclays would have to pay a chunky “buyout” to convince them to leave their current employer. Such payments, known as “golden hellos”, are unpopular with UK investors and politicians. 

“Given the business model of Barclays, the candidate needs deep experience of investment banking,” the person said. “This raises the question of whether you can pay, whether you can buy out, if you go outside for an external candidate.” 

A spokesperson for Barclays declined to comment. 

Since joining as chief executive at the end of 2015, Mr Staley, a former JPMorgan banker, has put Barclays’ investment bank on a stronger footing, helping the company fend off attacks from activist investor Edward Bramson, who wants the unit to be scaled back. Last year, the bank hit its headline profitability target, a 9 per cent return on tangible equity, despite scepticism that it could meet the goal. 

However, shares in the bank have fallen by about a quarter during his tenure and he has faced two regulatory investigations, including the Epstein probe.

READ ALSO  Big Tech shows its resilience to pandemic and politics

The FCA probe is focused on whether Mr Staley downplayed his links to Epstein by describing their relationship as professional, according to several people briefed on it. The Barclays CEO said he has been “transparent” about his relationship with Mr Epstein.

If Mr Staley has to stand down early because of the probe, the bank is likely to put an interim leadership team in place while it continues to search for his successor, one of the people said. 

The Epstein investigation comes less than two years after a whistleblowing scandal that very nearly cost Mr Staley his job. The FCA and PRA fined Mr Staley £640,000 for twice trying to reveal the identity of an anonymous whistleblower.