Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

Last month, Barr issued a directive to U.S. attorneys across the country allowing them to pursue any “substantial allegations” of voting irregularities, if they existed, before the 2020 presidential election was certified.

And today, in an interview with The Associated Press, Barr said U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received…

Most claims of fraud are very particularized to a particular set of circumstances or actors or conduct. They are not systemic allegations… And those have been run down; they are being run down,” Barr said.

“Some have been broad and potentially cover a few thousand votes. They have been followed up on.”

But, as AP reports, they’ve uncovered no evidence that would change the outcome of the election.

“To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election,” Barr told the AP.

Additionally, while Barr didn’t name Sidney Powell specifically, he added:

There’s been one assertion that would be systemic fraud and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results….

And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that, and so far, we haven’t seen anything to substantiate that.

In the meantime, here are 20 ‘facts’ that don’t pass the smell test that perhaps AG Barr and his crack DoJ election team could probe a little harder…

READ ALSO  Jobs at The Economist - We’re hiring | Finance & economics

We will not be holding our breath for President Trump’s response to AG Barr’s ‘findings’, as we suspect it’s coming given what he is watching…

Via Zerohedge

  • bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 37,037.00
  • ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 1,259.36
  • tetherTether (USDT) $ 0.999877
  • litecoinLitecoin (LTC) $ 147.36
  • bitcoin-cashBitcoin Cash (BCH) $ 501.70